Legal Pluralism dan Sharia Council di Inggris
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70182/jca.v2i6.1930Keywords:
Legal Pluralism, Sharia Councils, England.Abstract
This article examines the phenomenon of sharia councils in England within the framework of legal pluralism. As a country with a unitary legal system, England faces sociological and juridical challenges as the Muslim community's demand for Islamic law–based resolution of family disputes increases. This study uses a socio-normative method with a conceptual approach to analyze how sharia councils operate in the private sphere of citizens without formal authority from state law. The findings show that the existence of sharia councils reflects a form of legal pluralism that functions de facto within English society. Although sharia councils have successfully resolved critical issues such as limping marriages (marriages left in limbo because of divergent religious and civil divorce statuses), their position has sparked intense debate concerning women’s rights and equality before the law. The article concludes that the informal accommodation of sharia councils in England demonstrates a complex and dynamic relationship between the state's secular law and religious law, in which social integration often requires tacit recognition of the reality of plural legal orders.
Downloads
References
Abdul Halim. (2022). Non-Muslims in the Qanun Jinayat and the choice of law in Sharia courts in Aceh. Human Rights Review, 23, 265–288.
Azzouz, F. (2026). Navigating legal pluralism in Britain: A BSM-inspired approach. Ethnicities.
Bano, S. (2012). Muslim women and Sharia councils. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Djawas, M., et al. (2024). Harmonization of state, custom, and Islamic law in Aceh: Perspective of legal pluralism. Hasanuddin Law Review, 10(1), 64–82.
Elrifai, S. (2016). Choosing Sharia? Multiculturalism, Islamic fundamentalism & Sharia councils. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 14(4), 1034–1038.
Griffiths, J. (1986). What is legal pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism, 24, 1–55.
Kyriazi, T. (2021). Legal pluralism, Sharia law and the right to fair trial: A case for incompatibility within the Council of Europe. The International Journal of Human Rights, 25(8), 1233–1257.
Latipah Nasution. (2017). Sistem hukum pada masyarakat pluralis. ADALAH, 1(8).
Lukito, R. (2019). Legal pluralism in Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenadamedia.
Lukito, R., & Az-Zahra, M. S. (2026). Codification of Islamic law in comparative perspective: Between tradition and modernity. Samarah, 10(1).
Muhammadun, M. (2020). Pluralisme hukum dalam bingkai masyarakat madani: Masa Nabi dan masa kini. Jurnal Indo-Islamika, 4(2), 171–184.
Mutmainnah, & Rahmawati. (2020). Eksistensi dan reformasi hukum keluarga Islam di Inggris. DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, 18(2), 154–173.
Qureshi, K. (2021). Courting agency: Gender and divorce in an English Sharia council. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 27(2), 384–401.
Sukarti, D. (2013). Legal pluralism in settling inheritance disputes in Besemah, South Sumatera. AHKAM: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 13(1).
Sulthani, D. A. (2023). Dynamics of Sharia implementation in England. Kordinat: Jurnal Komunikasi antar Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam, 22(1), 77–96.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2006). A general jurisprudence of law and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zed, M. (2018). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
“Legal pluralism within the space of Sharia: Interlegality of criminal law traditions in Aceh, Indonesia.” (2021). Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 5(1), 426–449.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yudi Herman Saputra, Isnatin Ulfah (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.










