Persepsi Pengunjung Lama Perpustakaan Jakarta Taman Ismail Marzuki dalam Memaknai Sense Of Place
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71417/jca.v3i2.2361Keywords:
Persepsi, Sense Of Place, Place Attachment, Place Dependence, Place Identity, Perpustakaan Publik, Ruang PublikAbstract
Persepsi pengunjung terhadap suatu ruang publik tidak hanya dibentuk oleh fungsi fisiknya, tetapi juga oleh pengalaman yang terbentuk melalui kunjungan berulang. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui persepsi pengunjung lama Perpustakaan Jakarta Taman Ismail Marzuki dalam memaknai Sense of Place. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui wawancara mendalam dan observasi. Informan penelitian merupakan pengunjung yang telah mengunjungi perpustakaan secara berulang dalam jangka waktu yang cukup panjang. Penelitian ini menggunakan teori persepsi DeVito (2016), yang mencakup lima tahapan, yaitu stimulasi, organisasi, interpretasi dan evaluasi, memori, serta pengingatan kembali. Konsep Sense of Place mengacu pada Tuan (2001) dan tiga dimensinya menurut Jorgensen dan Stedman (2006), yaitu place identity, place attachment, dan place dependence. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa persepsi pengunjung lama terbentuk secara bertahap melalui pengalaman kunjungan yang berulang, sehingga menghasilkan pemahaman yang lebih mendalam terhadap perpustakaan. Meskipun aktivitas yang dilakukan relatif serupa, setiap informan memiliki pemaknaan personal yang berbeda, mulai dari tempat belajar, tempat melepas penat, hingga rumah kedua. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa Perpustakaan Jakarta Taman Ismail Marzuki tidak hanya dipandang sebagai ruang publik yang memiliki fungsi fisik, tetapi juga sebagai tempat yang memiliki makna dan keterikatan personal bagi pengunjung lama.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, M., & Wilkins, S. (2025). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity, 59, 1461–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5
Arias Valencia, M. M. (2022). Principles, scope, and limitations of the methodological triangulation. Investigación y Educación en Enfermería, 40(2), e03. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v40n2e03
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
Denny, E., & Weckesser, A. (2022). How to do qualitative research? Qualitative research methods. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 129(7), 1166–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17150
Devito, J. A. (2016). The Interpersonal Communication Book (14th Global Edition). Pearson Education Limited.
Diener, A. C., & Hagen, J. (2022). The power of place in place attachment. Geographical Review, 112(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2021.1884983
Erfani, G. (2022). Reconceptualising sense of place: Towards a conceptual framework for investigating individual-community-place interrelationships. Journal of Planning Literature, 37(3), 452–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122221081109
Fard, A. K., & Paydar, M. (2024). Place attachment and related aspects in the urban setting. Urban Science, 8(3), 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8030135
Garnar, M., & Tonyan, J. (2021). Library as place: Understanding contradicting user expectations. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(5), 102391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102391
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Jamali, H. R., Coe, M., & Garner, J. (2022). Public library building and development: Understanding community consultation and the design process. Public Library Quarterly, 42, 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2022.2115587
Jorgensen, B. S., & Stedman, R. C. (2006). A comparative analysis of predictors of Sense of Place dimensions: Attachment to, dependence on, and identification with lakeshore properties. Journal of Environmental Management, 79(3), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.08.003
Knott, E., Rao, A. H., Summers, K., & Teeger, C. (2022). Interviews in the social sciences. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2, 73. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00150-6
Peterson, M. (2023). Libraries as felt spaces: Atmospheres, public space and feelings of dis/comfort. Emotion, Space & Society, 49, 100986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2023.100986
Robles, J. C., & Thomas, D. T. (2024). Placing Mexican ethnic enclaves: Toward a recursive model of place attachment. Critical Sociology, 50(7–8), 1223–1239. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205231216429
Shin, D., Jeon, K., & Lee, H.-E. (2022). Public library needs assessment to build a community-based library: Triangulation method with a social media data analysis. Library & Information Science Research, 44(1), 101142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101142
Tuan, Y. F. (2001). Space and Place The Perspective of Experience (8th ed.). University of Minnesota Press.
Voorheis, P., Petch, J., Pham, Q., & Kuluski, K. (2023). Maximizing the value of patient and public involvement in the digital health co-design process: A qualitative descriptive study with design leaders and patient-public partners. PLOS Digital Health, 2(10), e0000213. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000213
Westerholt, R., Acedo, A., & Naranjo-Zolotov, M. (2022). Exploring Sense of Place in relation to urban facilities—Evidence from Lisbon. Cities, 127, 103750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103750
Zahnow, R. (2024). Place type or place function: What matters for place attachment? American Journal of Community Psychology, 73(3–4), 446–460. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12722
Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., & Liang, Y. (2024). Exploring the impact of accessibility on place attachment in urban public open spaces: A case study of Jiamusi City, China. Buildings, 14(4), 957. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14040957
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Farhan Nauvaldy, Fifit Fitriansyah, Mety Titin Herawati (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
